Thursday, December 22, 2016

make way for the morrow

THREADS (originally aired September 23, 1984; d: Mick Jackson)


As we cross the threshold into a burgeoning dystopian tomorrow and pause at the edge of the steepest precipice of that dreaded, unfathomable hereafter, braced for the worst, it's best we prepare for whatever untoward scenarios might come our way.  


While the imbecilic new leader of the free world and de facto tyrant-in-training prepares to deregulate industry, dismantle the EPA (and the FDA), and ramp up international tensions, it’s a fair guess that if our complete decimation of the environment doesn’t get us, our escalating capacity to murder on a grand scale will.  Sure, we can keep our chins up and our resolve strong, and try to remain positive—but all that and a can of soup will leave you hungry.  


So let us take a moment and have a look at one possible worst-case scenario, as indelibly related by the cataclysmic made-for-BBC sonic death knell from 1984, THREADS.



From its opening moments, it is quite clear that THREADS is playing by its own set of rules and was created to deliver one message only: mankind is heading in a very bad direction and if we continue, there will be apocalyptic results.  Concisely written by Barry Hines (and directed by Mick Jackson), it’s a dire warning steeped deeply in the anti-nuke rhetoric of the mid-1980’s.  But to a troubled world that has learned so very little in the ensuing years, it’s just as relevant as ever.


As THREADS begins, we're introduced to a pair of young lovers, Jimmy Kemp (Reece Dinsdale) and Ruth Beckett (Karen Meagher), and through them their parents and siblings.  And as they all go about their day-to-day existence in gritty, industrial Sheffield, England, a foreboding, escalating international crisis plays out in the newspapers and on the TV sets and radios which speckle the backdrop.



It's all played out very matter-of-fact, and with no music or sermonizing to skew emotions, its decidedly sober, quasi-documentary approach lets the viewer know early on that as things go from bad to worse, the stoic, unflinching THREADS will offer no spiritual reprieves.  


















After weeks of rising tensions due to an alleged U.S.-backed coup in Iran, Russian troops cross its northern border, which prompts the U.S. to send its own soldiers to protect the much-coveted oil fields. (familiar?)  When an American nuclear submarine disappears in the Persian Gulf and the mounting evidence points to Soviet involvement, an irreversible course is set.




Throughout THREADS, detailed lists of logistics, scientific analysis and hypotheses unspool onscreen, offering rare insight into the numbers and probabilities of an ensuing nuclear war. Early on, we learn that Sheffield, already an industrial target, is also only 17 miles from the nearest military target, an RAF base.





As we get to meet and know the Kemp and Beckett families, respectively, there is a growing sense that their stories are not the story, but rather just further detail in a singularly grim cinematic tapestry.  With very little in the way of traditional character motivation or individual conflict, it's as if we're being set up to watch lab rats respond to some awful trauma. THREADS goes about the forbidding, untidy business of disassembling our civilization with a cold, uncompromising candor necessary to compel its audience to action.  It is a message of certain, utter doom, meant to entertain nobody.



At the bar, now weeks into the growing crisis, Ruth tells Jimmy she's pregnant.  "It's not the end of the world."  It's all handled rather perfunctorily, with Jimmy, hesitant at first, deciding it best they marry, and the two families getting together over dinner to hash it all out. 



But as the young couple begins setting up house in a new apartment, the crisis reaches its boiling point.





Soon after, we meet yet a third group of characters, the Sheffield Emergency Response team, which convenes in a basement office and begins pondering the worst. 




And then...









Bike (with rider), suspended from a tree.

The first half of THREADS does its work preparing the viewer for its second half. Its deadly serious theme and tone are unmistakable.  But nothing can quite prepare the viewer for what is in store.  There is simply nothing like what you'll experience in all the annals of movie history.  


It isn't simply the graphic realism I refer to.  After the bombs fall (210 total megatons on the UK alone), all that remains on the other side of that equation is endless suffering, hunger and hopelessness.



I had initially planned to focus much of my attention on the implacable force of the second half of THREADS, if only because the anti-nuke movement which propelled this essential film to fruition has all but ceased.  But I feel this prolonged dirge through hell has already spoken its heart and mind and much further dwelling on this subject will do me no good whatsoever.  Just a couple of moments remain that I would like to leave you with.


After the bombs have their way with Sheffield, Jimmy Kemp's parents hide behind a makeshift shelter (a kitchen door) for what seems like days, too sick and weak and injured to muster much more than occasional muted cries of anguish and vomiting.



Like most of which follows, it is a scene of total despair, and one can only hope their suffering will end soon.  But Mrs. Kemp, badly burned and aware that her time is limited, becomes determined to look for Jimmy's little brother, who was nearby during the blast. And so husband and wife set out, shamblingand then on hands and kneesto find their boy.  



And the fires rage on all around them.





And Mrs. Kemp, in a crawl, spots a shoe.  His shoe.  He's buried in rubble, but at least the boy was spared a worse fate.  



Sobbing weakly yet without respite, it takes all but her last shred of energy to hoist herself forward so she can grab hold and kiss the last piece of her boy she'll ever see, his sneaker.  


Across town, the Beckett's have fared a bit better using their basement as a shelter. Of course, the fallout has made everyone ill, regardless.





And Ruth Beckett, too distraught for food, responds in kind when her mother insists she eat for her unborn child's sake.  "I don't care about this baby anymore!"


After her grandmother dies and the three remaining Becketts drag the body upstairs, a despondent Ruth wanders off into the streets, perhaps looking for Jimmy, though seemingly aimless.




Through a haze of toxic smoke and fallout, she plods tentatively onward, from one awful scene to the next, a reluctant arrival to hell.  



When a hysterical young boy approaches her screaming for his mother, eyes bulging psychosis, she regards him briefly but keeps pressing forward.  



During this excursion, it becomes clear that the lucky ones are already dead.  The survivors, for however long they may last, are either terribly burned or sick or injured, with many having simply gone mad.  



















By the end of her tour, Ruth is not quite the same woman.  As she approaches a mother holding a baby—a charred, lifeless baby—Ruth has already emotionally run the gamut and seems incapable of being shocked.  And so all she can manage is to return the woman's cold, barren stare.







The entire movie, uncut, if you can ignore the Italian subtitles.


Thursday, December 8, 2016

drive-in eternus


While the fate of the great American drive-in all but dangles by a tattered thread, it lives on herein spirit, at leasthopefully for many coming generations to endeavor. Notice that speaker sound, metallically distilled and cavernous; as any aficionado of watching movies under the stars will attest, this video is a near-perfect simulation of the drive-in sound and experience.  While I am ambivalent to the soon-to-be prospect of headstones with video messages (and the like), they can go ahead and put this one on mine.  I can think of nothing better to leave them with. 
  


Friday, December 2, 2016

alone time

Oh, to be tucked away in some forsaken wintry pocket of seclusion, a man and his hands and determination, gone from it all.  Alone with the wilder things, at peace with the ice-kissed ether, lost from the maddening crowd.  And as the world slipped further into its oblivion, I would be out there, living, with not a concern for their wretched thoughts or movements. Civilization is but a bittersweet reminiscence as the days stretch on in the silent splendor of the hinterlands—away from them all.




I may take up carpentry yet!

Thursday, December 1, 2016

over easy

In this remarkable local Baltimore television profile from 1978, which attempts to summarize Edith Massey's strange claim to stardom, we get a rare and intimate glimpse into the life and work of one of John Water's most indelible early trademarks. Hailed here as the "queen of punk rock" and "queen of the underground", she is likewise lauded "the most universally loved figure in Baltimore since Brooks Robinson". As is apparent below, it all couldn't have happened to a nicer woman.  All hail the Egg Lady!



Friday, November 25, 2016

while you sleep

Nightmare at 43 Hillcrest (ABC’S Wide World of Mystery; originally broadcast 8/20/74)

In this rather perilous, long-forgotten vista into a lost suburbia, circa 1974, a real-life nightmare scenario unfolds for a mild-mannered family of three. The subject of this tense, foreboding episode of ABC’S WIDE WORLD OF MYSTERY (produced by Dan Curtis), based on true accounts, is arguably as relevant today as it ever has been.



The story begins as the camera silently probes the darkness in and around the Leyden residence, while they sleep.  It’s an ominous preamble to a home invasion, and when the front door bursts in and a group of armed men drag the Leydens out of their bedrooms, casting menace and threatening violence at every turn, it’s easy to assume this average American family is being robbed, or worse.


But there’s a twist here, and it’s a rather unsettling one: the intruders are detectives from the local police, and it seems they believe the Leydens are drug pushers.



Less than a minute into this chaotic scene, it’s quite apparent the Leydens believe, like the rest of us, that they are being robbed.  Only after being assaulted and knocked to the ground in front of his horrified wife and teenage daughter does Greg Leyden (Jim Hutton) learn the truth: these guys are detectives and are in his home to arrest him—to arrest them—for dealing heroin.  Furthermore, their brutal leader, Detective Clarence Hartog (Peter Mark Richman), is steadfast in his conviction that the Leydens are dope pushers. 


Esther (Emmaline Henry) and Nancy Leyden (Linda Curtis), awake in a nightmare.
But just as soon as the detective has pistol-whipped Greg Leydon to the ground in front of his shocked wife and daughter, his second in command, Detective Sanford ‘Sandy’ Bates (Don Dubbins), is grabbing his elbow, looking gravely concerned.  After some prodding, he manages to corral his hard-driving superior out front for a word in private. 


And, oops…well, it seems they’ve hit the wrong house—they were supposed to raid 43 North Hillcrest.  Additionally, they’ve just terrorized an innocent family and viciously assaulted its patriarch as result of their egregious error.  But as Sandy is about to head back in and spill the beans, Hartog takes hold…"I’m arresting these people." "You’re what?!"  "You heard me.  I can’t afford to blow 20 years over a little mistake." "A little mistake?!"  


"There’s some heroin packaged in the car.  Plant ‘em.”  “Clarence, these people are innocent!"  "Do you want to go back to walking the beat?!"


And so the Leydens are taken downtown and booked while Detective Hartog has his picture taken with Sandy and a case full of heroin for the morning newspaper.



And that is how the nightmare begins in this 71 minute, shot-on-videotape (and on the fly) made-for-TV potboiler.  As television went in those days, this was all but disposable product, but of the many dozens of network-exclusive cheapo thrillers aired that same year, few distinguished themselves with the kind of verve and visceral emotional impact that a story like this one all but promises to deliver.

"Oh God, I can't believe this is happening!"  "What are we gonna do?!"


Out on bail the following day, the Leydens see the dire immediate impact of their arrests. Greg learns he's been fired from work, their daughter, Nancy (Linda Curtis), has been expelled from high school, and they've become personae non gratae throughout the community.  



What's more, their front door has been defaced and they immediately begin receiving vulgar, harassing phone calls.  When someone throws a large stone through their living room window with an unutterable message attached, Greg, on the verge of a nervous breakdown, can muster only one desperate, disgusted word—“Filth!”


Veteran TV mainstay, Jim Hutton, gives the best performance of the cast..

Worse yet, the police have destroyed their home searching for drugs and evidence.  And their lawyer, seemingly their only protection from all this stark raving madness, is advising them to plead guilty and take a plea deal (and prison time).



"They've got 8 bags of heroin that says you are guilty!"
As these things so often tend to go, there is light at the end of the tunnel for the Leydens, something unexpectedand perhaps the least believable aspect of this story: an honest cop, present during the raid, risks his career to set the record straight and save the family.


And, reluctantly, an idealistic young D.A.'s assistant (Mariette Hartley) begins to believe the noble detective, gradually building a case alleging a frame-up against the Leydens.



Alas, while the pendulum of justice still often sways from its intended path, that "one good cop" high-mindedness alluded to here is more often than not the product of fiction, as dissention among the ranks and whistle-blowing are typically met with career-ending circumstances few are willing to risk.


Peter Mark Richman, eviscerating the scenery.

On a tragic side-note, Linda Curtis (daughter of producer Dan Curtis), who stars here as daughter Nancy, is listed as having passed away the following year, 1975, at the age of 20.  This is her only known role, for which she gives a very fair account of herself. Despite much scouring of the web, details of her death remain elusive.





Tuesday, November 8, 2016

I'll fly away

"Third from the Sun" (TWILIGHT ZONE, originally broadcast January 8, 1960)



I must admit to a certain amount of distraction as of late, to the degree that I didn’t believe I’d be doing anything here at all until this abysmal election was finally over and done with.  With that in mind, I chose something that is more or less thematically compatible with my current disposition.


Based on the short story by noted fantasist, Richard Matheson—and adapted by Rod Serling—“Third from the Sun” follows the plight of troubled family man and scientist, Will Sturka (Fritz Weaver), whose work in a government weapons plant offers him a distinct vantage point into his nation's foreign policy.


"You a defeatist, Sturka?  That's dangerous thinking.  You'd better mind what you say."  "And what I think, too, eh?"  "And what you think."

Amid a pronounced increase in bomb-making and hushed rumors of imminent nuclear war, Will and his friend and colleague, Jerry Riden (Joe Maross), have been plotting an exit strategy for months—one that involves pirating an experimental government spacecraft capable of reaching other galaxies.



Jerry, who’s been test-piloting the new ship, has also mapped out a destination—a planet 11 million miles away, with people and an atmosphere not dissimilar to their own. 

"11 million miles...in a ship we're not even sure will leave the atmosphere."  "That's the risk, though."  



But a superior from work by the name of Carling (Edward Andrews) has been watching Sturka closely, and seems aware something is amiss just as he and Jerry are about to make their move.


"It's coming, boy, it's really coming...and a big one, too!"
And move, they must, because a global nuclear war is about to commence any time now.  "You see if I'm not right...48 hours and we'll have them aloft." And so, despite Carling's hinting that he is on to them, they can wait no longer to gather their families.


"But I have a date tonight."  "Break it, Jody, will you?" 
"Everyone I talk to lately, they've been noticing..."  "Noticing what, Jo?"  "That something's wrong.  That something's in the air."
"It'll be a holocaust.  It will be hell...the end of everything we know.  People, places, ideas--everything"
"We're leaving...you and Jody and I, Jerry and Ann.  We're leaving tonight."


But as they assemble on the final evening before their planned late-night departure, playing bridge to keep up appearances, Sturka's budding nemesis, Carling, pops up once again to shake the tree.



"I was just telling your wife she makes wonderful lemonade.  Hot night, too.  This is a night for a front porch...or sleep.  But nothing else."


"You're a little nervous, Mrs. Sturka.  You're very nervous."


After a tense game of cat and mouse, Carling departs, letting Will know beyond doubt that he knows what they're planning.  And just as he's out the door, Will's boss is calling on the phone—they're sending a car to pick him up.  And so the time is now...or never.



"Third from the Sun" is one of the classic Twilight Zone episodes, for a number of reasons—including its taut, compelling script and Richard L. Bare’s memorably expressionistic, claustrophobic direction—but what really makes this one tick is the intense back and forth between Sturka and Carling.  As Will Sturka, Fritz Weaver’s visceral tight-rope act of barely-masked contempt and paranoia is wonderfully offset by the loathsome Carling (Edward Andrews, amiably detestable as ever), who enjoys the game and doesn't mind letting on, if only because he just can't help himself.  

"You ever think there might be people on one of those stars out there?"  "The thought has crossed my mind."
In times like these, it's easy to relate to a man like Will Sturka.  A man made cynical by a world beholden to its hate and fearsa world bent on destroying itself.  A man of ideals coming to grips with a society that seems to have run out of them.  



And when he's left no choice, and forced to leave his world, it's little wonder we're optimistic for himfor them.  It's our nature.  Sure they'll make it...what else is there? What, there's people there, you say?  Are they sure they picked the right one?